Future Faith: Challenge Five: Affirming Spirit-Filled Communities

“We want power”, “But we don’t know what it’s for.”

The power of God’s Spirit is given to us to be witnesses to God’s transforming love. “We’re not here,” Christine Claine proclaimed, “to entertain ourselves.”

The rise of pentecostalism

Pentecostalism is spreading throughout the world like a spiritual tsunami.

One out of every four Christians in the world is Pentecostal or charismatic. One of four Pentecostals is an Asian, and 80 percent of Christian conversions in Asia are to Pentecostal forms of Christianity. One out of three Pentecostals is in Africa. In Latin America, Pentecostalism is growing at three times the rate of Catholicism.

Think of it this way. One out of every twelve people alive in the world today is Pentecostal.

pentecostalism and the marginalized

“the extraordinary success of the Pentecostal movement is largely due to its reach to those on the periphery of society.”

Early Pentecostalism had a deep, intentional social outreach embedded within its ministries.

Too often Pentecostalism is associated with mass media “prosperity preachers” and “health and wealth” ideology. These movements, though not dominant, are persistent. Where they flourish, the gospel is poorer and positive social contributions are few.

The rapid growth in forms of Christian practice that place a strong emphasis on religious experience as well as the cohesive value of Christian community. These expressions of faith are full of spiritual vitality and highly contextualized to local culture.

emerging pentecostalism

Pentecostalism, especially as it is emerging in the non-Western world, is a postmodern faith. I’ve often said, “An evangelical wants to know what you believe, while a Pentecostal wants to hear your spiritual story.” Perhaps it’s an oversimplification. But Pentecostalism embodies a strong emphasis on narrative and finds reality in spiritual experiences that defy the logic and rationality of modern Western culture.

Understanding Pentecostalism, especially as it is emerging in the Global South as a non-Western religion thriving in a postmodern world, also includes understanding how to grasp the power of its worship and preaching.

Most of the famous Pentecostal preachers I’ve heard at world conferences would fail a homiletics class at any Reformed seminary. But the purpose is not so much to expound well-reasoned theological truths as it is to incite an intensity of spiritual experience.

those worshipping are longing for, and experiencing, a direct, corporate participation in the presence of the Holy Spirit resulting in their spiritual empowerment and giving glory to God.

The Pentecostal movement in Africa today, he argues, is marked by inclusion, promise, and fulfillment.

Todd Johnson and Kenneth Ross, put it this way: “Pentecostalism . . . became the main contributor to the reshaping of Christianity from a predominantly Western to a predominantly non-Western phenomenon in the twentieth century.”

As Christine Caine said in her address, quoting from Isaiah 43, God “is doing a new thing.” The question for those in Babylonian captivity at that time and those in captivity to modern Western culture now is whether we will see it.

bringing together separate worlds

with Pentecostalism’s dramatic growth now being driven largely from outside of the West, new opportunities arise for building bridges. In my estimation, this is the most pressing challenge to building unity within the body of Christ in today’s world. Creating such bridges will uncover some unexpected points of connection. One is the link between contemplative prayer and Pentecostalism.

The recovery of the contemplative tradition in the West, interpreted most powerfully in the past fifty years by Thomas Merton, and more recently by writers like Thomas Keating and Richard Rohr, focuses on restoring the primacy of spiritual experience.

In this light, Richard Rohr sees an affinity to Pentecostal experience: Pentecostals and charismatics are a significant modern-era exception to this avoidance of experience; I believe their “baptism in the Spirit” is a true and valid example of initial mystical encounter. The only things they often lack, which keeps them from maturity, are some good theology, developmental psychology, and social concerns to keep their feet in this incarnate world. Without these, their ego-inflating experiences have frequently led to superficial and falsely conservative theology and right-wing politics. . . . But the core value and transformative truth of initial God experience is still there, right beneath the surface, in many people who were “baptized in both fire and Spirit,” which is Jesus’ baptism (Matthew 3:11b).

While some may assume that the distance between the solitude and silence of a Trappist monastery with monks in contemplative prayer at 4:00 a.m. and the robust, clamoring, hand-waving worship of Pentecostals with mantra-like shouts of praise could not be further apart, they are united in a deep quest for the experiential knowledge of the living God.

Growing opportunities for theological dialogue is one of the hopeful ways that the walls between Pentecostalism and the other parts of global Christian family can begin to break down.

pentecostalism and theology

Pentecostal theology is now plentiful, creative, rigorous, growing, and global.

Certainly, it’s true that the distance between the pew and the “academy” in Pentecostalism is a formidable problem. But critics of Pentecostalism often fail to recognize the serious theological development that has been emerging in this community, especially in the past three to four decades.

Put simply, while spiritual experience is the starting point for Pentecostalism, this movement is now demonstrating the capacity to reflect critically on the meaning of that experience and how it informs the continuing theological task.

a spirit of openness

All this means that Pentecostalism is becoming prepared to make a theological and ecclesiological contribution to world Christianity that is commensurate to its growing size.

As long as Pentecostalism’s image in the United States is shaped by glitzy television preachers with private jets preaching a prosperity gospel, it will be difficult to create the mutual encounter with one-quarter of all Christianity that is so needed.

Growing far faster than Catholicism, Pentecostals are drawn largely from poorer and marginalized communities.

Frank Chikane summarized his convictions simply: “When the Spirit comes, people go out.”

A major test for the future of Pentecostalism is whether its roots among the marginalized and its gift of spiritual empowerment will nurture more than rich personal spiritual fulfillment and be directed toward community and societal transformation.

The struggle for the non-Pentecostal Christian world, particularly in the United States, is to overcome its deep spiritual prejudices and its sense of inherent theological superiority.

Immigration, the unexpected and largely unrecognized vehicle of God’s ongoing mission, is making the realities of the global church local.

The new ecumenical frontier, in many ways, can be found in building bridges close to home that cross the major global divide between Pentecostal and non-Pentecostal worlds.

In that journey, we will be asked whether we believe the words of Paul in First Corinthians: “we all have been made to drink of the one Spirit” (1 Cor 12:13).

discussion guide

  • When you hear the term spirit-filled communities what do you envision? In what ways is your faith community spirit-filled? In what ways is it not?
  • What did you learn about Pentecostal communities in this chapter? What example or perspective stood out for you? Why?
  • In what ways does the author say that Pentecostal communities of faith sometimes live within a bubble, insulated from other Christian communities?
  • One critique of Pentecostalism is that it focuses on experience but is lacking in good theology, and even disdains academic theology. What is true about this critique? How is this changing?
  • What can be gained by “recognizing and affirming the spirit-filled gifts of the global Pentecostal world”?
  • What more do you want to learn or do based on reading this chapter of the book?

 

Previous post can be found here:

Challenge One: Revitalizing Withering Congregations

Challenge Two: Embracing the Color of the Future

Challenge Three: Seeing through Non-Western Eyes

Challenge Four: Perceiving the World as Sacred

For more on this, please support the author and buy his book at Amazon or Fortress Press. I do not receive any compensation for this summary.

Future Faith: Challenge Four: Perceiving the World as Sacred

Emptying creation of its intrinsic, sacred value, derived from the life of the Creator, now threatens the actual sustainability of the planet’s life-supporting systems.

The eclipse of creation and the subjugation of life to capitalist imagination is also the eclipse of the sacred. The natural world as a community of kindred subjects and the bearer of mystery and spirit is nostalgia, if a memory at all. When everything is for sale, the numinous is leeched away like water from sand. Awe and wonder fade as the full drama of life in the natural world—death and renewal, birth and rebirth, life lost and emergent—eludes our waking hours. Rich though we be as consumers, as creatures who belong body and soul to the cosmos we are paupers.

The heart of the crisis lies in humanity’s distorted relationship to the creation and its Creator.

This has not always been so. Nor is the relationship between humanity and creation perceived in this way throughout much of the non-Western world, including those areas where Christianity is growing with explosive speed. The church that has dominated Western society, with its wedding to Enlightenment thought and the unforgiving capitalist exploitation of nature, now faces a task of theological reconstruction if it truly believes that “God so loved the world . . .” (John 3:16).

Human redemption can only be understood as part of the redemption of the whole creation.

“the creative energy of God is the true being of all that is; matter is that spirit or energy in physical form. Therefore, we should regard our human environment as the energy of God in a form that is accessible to our senses.”

Such understandings of “cosmic” incarnation and redemption found expression in the Eastern church in early church fathers such as Gregory of Nyssa. Those voices were less prevalent in the Western church, but with some very prominent exceptions. Saint Francis of Assisi was most notable, of course, extolling the familial harmony—“Brother Sun, Sister Moon”—of creation’s web as the embodiment of God’s love. Saint Bonaventure, who followed Francis as a formative leader of the Franciscan order, described God as “within all things but not enclosed; outside all things but not excluded; above all things but not aloof; below all things but not debased. . . . [W]hose center is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.”

discussion guide

  • What historical developments in both society and the church have had an impact on how we view the sacred or holy in our modern world?
  • How do you respond to this quote by Larry Rasmussen: “Rich though we be as consumers, as creatures who belong body and soul to the cosmos we are paupers”? Do you agree that creation has been compromised by modern human action? Why or why not?
  • To what voices or perspectives does the author suggest we pay close attention? Why?
  • How would you complete this statement: The created world is _________.
  • What more do you want to learn or do based on reading this chapter of the book?

 

Previous posts can be found here:

Challenge One: Revitalizing Withering Congregations

Challenge Two: Embracing the Color of the Future

Challenge Three: Seeing through Non-Western Eyes

For more on this, please support the author and buy his book at Amazon or Fortress Press. I do not receive any compensation for this summary.

Future Faith: Challenge Three: Seeing through Non-Western Eyes

In 1980, for the first time in a thousand years, more Christians were living in the Global South than the Global North.

Christianity has now become predominantly a non-Western religion. It is moving out of the cradle of Western culture and the Enlightenment, which shaped and formed most of Christian faith for the last four hundred years. This means a commonly accepted way of thinking, with rules, models, and assumptions governing how we observe and interpret reality, is changing in unanticipated ways. We’re undergoing a major paradigm shift.

Attention must be placed on the startling fact that world Christianity has now become a non-Western religion. Today, Christianity is experiencing its greatest growth and vitality in cultures that historically have not been framed by the Western Enlightenment and secular modernity.

It’s no easy task to outline this major paradigm shift, a majority of the world’s Christians today live in cultures where they put on a different set of glasses to view and interact with the world.

Andrew Walls has spent much of his career in Africa studying the forms of emerging Christianity in that continent and then contributing to the overall study and understanding of world Christianity. Lamin Sanneh, once described Walls as “one of the few scholars who saw that African Christianity was not just an exotic, curious phenomenon in an obscure part of the world, but that African Christianity might be the shape of things to come.”

Andrew Walls says this: The most striking feature of Christianity at the beginning of the third millennium is that it is predominantly a non-Western religion. . . . We have long been used to a Christian theology that was shaped by the interaction of Christian faith with Greek philosophy and Roman law. . . . These forms have become so familiar and established that we have come to think of them as the normal and characteristic forms of Christianity. In the coming century we can expect an accelerated process of new development arising from Christian interaction with the ancient cultures of Africa and Asia, an interaction now in progress but with much further to go.

Lens One: The Individual and Community

Enlightenment thought focused on the primacy of the individual. Non-Western cultures, on the other hand, often begin with the primacy of the community. Religious faith, with both its traditions and belief structures, is almost impossible to comprehend apart from a shared community that also transcends barriers of time.

Lens Two: Rational and Supernatural Approaches to Knowledge

Insight into and contact with the nature of reality comes through legends and rituals, or dances and vision quests, which provide portals into spiritual realities upholding all life. Knowing truth through abstract thinking is a foreign concept in a world where one can touch reality through sacred lived experiences.

Lens Three: The Material and the Spiritual World

Enlightenment thought reinforced a clear boundary between the material and spiritual.

Cultures in the non-Western world typically assume a far more fluid and interconnected relationship between the material and the spiritual. Spiritual forces and realities, both good and evil, permeate the so-called material world. The origin and life of material objects are connected to spiritual forces.

For most of world Christianity, the movement out of the enduring, comfortable cradle of Western culture to the non-Western world entails a fundamental reorientation of how culture and faith interact in the process of theology around crucial issues involving how we understand truth and experience reality.

Seeing through Non-Western Eyes

The understanding and role of Christian faith within the diversity of non-Western cultures is the playing field for the most important theological work, in my view, in the twenty-first century.

For most Christians in the United States, all this represents entirely new terrain. We don’t recognize how thoroughly we’ve become trained to see the world through the eyes of the Western Enlightenment, with all its prevailing assumptions.

For the future of Christian faith, this will no longer work. For Christians of all theological persuasions formed by modern Western culture, an imperative of our journey is learning to see reality through non-Western eyes.

The truth is that the glasses of the Western Enlightenment that have framed our view of the world now obscure reality more than reveal it. We shouldn’t simply be curious about how others see the world but rather seek to understand how our own vision has been distorted. We need corrective lenses for the sake of shaping a resilient and clear vision within our own culture in this time of dramatically shifting paradigms for understanding the world. That is part of the promise of embracing the future of Christianity as a non-Western religion.

discussion guide

  • What major shifts in the church does the author describe in this chapter?
  • How would you define the word paradigm? What has been the prevailing paradigm in your faith community? Why might you wish to change this prevailing paradigm? Or not?
  • The author describes one important shift as seeing the world through a different set of lenses. What examples of these lenses does he provide? Which of these examples was particularly striking to you? Why?
  • Why does the author say we are at a “hinge point” in the history of global Christianity? From that hinge point, how does the author see the future?
  • What is your reaction to the author’s discussion of seeing through Native American or Indigenous Peoples’ lenses? How can you or your faith community benefit from these perspectives?
  • What more do you want to learn or do based on reading this chapter of the book?

 

 

Previous posts can be found here:

Challenge One: Revitalizing Withering Congregations

Challenge Two: Embracing the Color of the Future

For more on this, please support the author and buy his book at Amazon or Fortress Press. I do not receive any compensation for this summary.