Future Faith: Challenge Three: Seeing through Non-Western Eyes

In 1980, for the first time in a thousand years, more Christians were living in the Global South than the Global North.

Christianity has now become predominantly a non-Western religion. It is moving out of the cradle of Western culture and the Enlightenment, which shaped and formed most of Christian faith for the last four hundred years. This means a commonly accepted way of thinking, with rules, models, and assumptions governing how we observe and interpret reality, is changing in unanticipated ways. We’re undergoing a major paradigm shift.

Attention must be placed on the startling fact that world Christianity has now become a non-Western religion. Today, Christianity is experiencing its greatest growth and vitality in cultures that historically have not been framed by the Western Enlightenment and secular modernity.

It’s no easy task to outline this major paradigm shift, a majority of the world’s Christians today live in cultures where they put on a different set of glasses to view and interact with the world.

Andrew Walls has spent much of his career in Africa studying the forms of emerging Christianity in that continent and then contributing to the overall study and understanding of world Christianity. Lamin Sanneh, once described Walls as “one of the few scholars who saw that African Christianity was not just an exotic, curious phenomenon in an obscure part of the world, but that African Christianity might be the shape of things to come.”

Andrew Walls says this: The most striking feature of Christianity at the beginning of the third millennium is that it is predominantly a non-Western religion. . . . We have long been used to a Christian theology that was shaped by the interaction of Christian faith with Greek philosophy and Roman law. . . . These forms have become so familiar and established that we have come to think of them as the normal and characteristic forms of Christianity. In the coming century we can expect an accelerated process of new development arising from Christian interaction with the ancient cultures of Africa and Asia, an interaction now in progress but with much further to go.

Lens One: The Individual and Community

Enlightenment thought focused on the primacy of the individual. Non-Western cultures, on the other hand, often begin with the primacy of the community. Religious faith, with both its traditions and belief structures, is almost impossible to comprehend apart from a shared community that also transcends barriers of time.

Lens Two: Rational and Supernatural Approaches to Knowledge

Insight into and contact with the nature of reality comes through legends and rituals, or dances and vision quests, which provide portals into spiritual realities upholding all life. Knowing truth through abstract thinking is a foreign concept in a world where one can touch reality through sacred lived experiences.

Lens Three: The Material and the Spiritual World

Enlightenment thought reinforced a clear boundary between the material and spiritual.

Cultures in the non-Western world typically assume a far more fluid and interconnected relationship between the material and the spiritual. Spiritual forces and realities, both good and evil, permeate the so-called material world. The origin and life of material objects are connected to spiritual forces.

For most of world Christianity, the movement out of the enduring, comfortable cradle of Western culture to the non-Western world entails a fundamental reorientation of how culture and faith interact in the process of theology around crucial issues involving how we understand truth and experience reality.

Seeing through Non-Western Eyes

The understanding and role of Christian faith within the diversity of non-Western cultures is the playing field for the most important theological work, in my view, in the twenty-first century.

For most Christians in the United States, all this represents entirely new terrain. We don’t recognize how thoroughly we’ve become trained to see the world through the eyes of the Western Enlightenment, with all its prevailing assumptions.

For the future of Christian faith, this will no longer work. For Christians of all theological persuasions formed by modern Western culture, an imperative of our journey is learning to see reality through non-Western eyes.

The truth is that the glasses of the Western Enlightenment that have framed our view of the world now obscure reality more than reveal it. We shouldn’t simply be curious about how others see the world but rather seek to understand how our own vision has been distorted. We need corrective lenses for the sake of shaping a resilient and clear vision within our own culture in this time of dramatically shifting paradigms for understanding the world. That is part of the promise of embracing the future of Christianity as a non-Western religion.

discussion guide

  • What major shifts in the church does the author describe in this chapter?
  • How would you define the word paradigm? What has been the prevailing paradigm in your faith community? Why might you wish to change this prevailing paradigm? Or not?
  • The author describes one important shift as seeing the world through a different set of lenses. What examples of these lenses does he provide? Which of these examples was particularly striking to you? Why?
  • Why does the author say we are at a “hinge point” in the history of global Christianity? From that hinge point, how does the author see the future?
  • What is your reaction to the author’s discussion of seeing through Native American or Indigenous Peoples’ lenses? How can you or your faith community benefit from these perspectives?
  • What more do you want to learn or do based on reading this chapter of the book?

 

 

Previous posts can be found here:

Challenge One: Revitalizing Withering Congregations

Challenge Two: Embracing the Color of the Future

For more on this, please support the author and buy his book at Amazon or Fortress Press. I do not receive any compensation for this summary.

Future Faith: Challenge Two: Embracing the Color of the Future

In the previous post about Future Faith I discussed the first challenge of revitalizing withering congregations. I discussed the question of whether churches will be locked into a parochial story of their gradual demise or liberated by a global story that is bringing new life into its midst from unexpected places.

Today I am discussing the second challenge of embracing the color of the future.

It seems to be the case that when people talk about the “Nones” they are talking mostly about whites. Just go to one of Portland’s fabulous downtown coffee shops such as Floyd’s, Barista, or Spella Caffe on a Sunday morning and look at who’s sipping a latte instead of singing in church. They’re mostly young, hip, urban, and white.

Pockets of growth and vitality among many different denominational groups are being driven by nonwhite believers.

Those in mainline Protestant churches steadily declined in number, from forty-one million in 2007 to thirty-six million in 2014 according to the Pew study. But during that same period, the percentage of nonwhites among those denominations increased from 9 percent to 14 percent *.

Decades earlier, the Reformed Church of America had established distinct racial-ethnic councils. Later, they committed themselves to antiracism training, instituted a new Commission on Race and Ethnicity, held summit meetings on “building a multiracial future,” and increased the racial diversity of their staff. Then, for the first time in their recent history, they adopted a new confession of faith.

The Belhar Confession came as a gift from the church in South Africa, born out of the struggle against apartheid, and declared that racial reconciliation, unity, and justice were essential dimensions of Christian faith.

Denominations across the US religious landscape must embrace a multiracial future, with all the changes in power and participation that this necessitates, or they will dwindle as self-protective white minorities.

White Protestants are in decline. From 1991 to 2014, their total number decreased by 33 percent *. At the same time, nonwhite racial-ethnic groups are becoming places of growth as well as fresh religious vitality within the changing US religious landscape.

Consider this: Among all those in the United States who are sixty-five or older today, nearly two-thirds are either white Protestants, white Catholics, or white evangelicals. But among those who are eighteen to twenty-nine, white believers make up only 28 percent of that total group *.

The commitment to challenge existing patterns of thought and structure, and to reconfigure the understanding of faith in a postmodern and post-Christian context, resonates deeply with millennials, as well as many others in the broader Christian world.

One of the issues frequently discussed about the emerging church movement is the extent of its racial diversity, or lack thereof. It’s a question that its own thought leaders have directly engaged. In some ways, we’re drawn back to the basic question about the “Nones”—how much is this a largely white phenomenon, and to what extent are efforts responding to this reality centered only in the progressive, white Christian community?

The above mentioned paragraph made me wonder if we as a predominantly white reformed church in Southern Africa, the Dutch Reformed Church, should focus on the white majority or shift focus to those that are non-white that have not heard the gospel, or does not have a place of refuge, of worship? Or, should it be an either-or-argument, or rather an and-and-argument? How can a predominantly white church focus on the marginalised without losing its current members? Maybe just doing the Gospel?

The other emerging reality in the US religious landscape that often has gone unnoticed is the growth of multiracial congregations.

In 2008 only 350,000 congregations in the US, only about 7 percent met that definition of being multiracial. But in recent years, Michael O. Emerson, one of the leading authors and researchers of multiracial congregations, has documented a marked increase in such congregations to 13.7 percent of US congregations.

Middle Collegiate Church vision reaches to a multiracial future. Long embodying that reality, for the past decade Middle and its lead pastor, Rev. Jacqui Lewis, have hosted an annual conference bringing together pastors and practitioners working in multiracial contexts and advocating for justice.

Public schools are found to be six times more diverse than the average US congregation. As long as such disparities persist, a younger generation, in particular, will find it unnatural to participate in churches preaching a message of reconciliation and love with a membership far less racially diverse than the schools they attended.

Central to the story of the Pentecost in Acts 2 and the early church, crossing the cultural and racial boundaries between Jew and Greek, producing congregations such as the one in Antioch with dramatic racial and cultural diversity reflected in its leadership (see Acts 13:1–2).

David Roozen’s study, “American Congregations 2015: Thriving and Surviving,” One striking finding was this: multiethnic congregations showed more spiritual vitality than their primarily white counterparts. Here’s what the study said: Racial/ethnic congregations remain more energized than congregations in which a majority of its members are white whether looking at vitality or attendance growth *. This important empirical observation shouldn’t lead to simplistic conclusions, denying, for instance, the evident spirituality and vitality found in any number of primarily white and growing congregations. Findings like these are always matters of percentages and degrees. In this case, for instance, 43.3 percent of multiethnic congregations were found to have high vitality, contrasted to 24 percent of majority white congregations. Further, 53.6 percent of multiethnic congregations showed growth in attendance, compared to 29 percent of the mostly white congregations that have long predominated in the US religious landscape. Those percentages are almost 2 to 1 contrasts, revealing a significant difference.

So, what is the color of America’s religious future?

  • Clearly, white will no longer be dominant.
  • Statistically, places of growth that are occurring within established denominations across the board in the United States—Catholic, evangelical, Pentecostal, and mainline Protestant—are being driven decisively by emerging nonwhite groups.
  • Spiritually, multi ethnic expressions of the church, increasing in number and influence, are more likely to exhibit vitality and growth.

The North American church must embrace the changing color of its future with a decisive shift in its dynamics of power or face a life as a dwindling white minority clinging to places of protective refuge.

discussion guide

  • What is a “None”? Do you know any? How has your faith community talked about the “Nones”?
  • Why does the author suggest that denominations and faith communities focus on being more multiracially diverse and aware?
  • What strategies or examples of racial diversity did the author provide? In what ways do these examples help or encourage your own faith community to become more racially diverse?
  • What is your reaction to the author’s statement that “the North American church must embrace the changing color of its future with its decisive shift in its dynamics of power”? If you agree with the statement, what might that mean for your faith community now and in the future?
  • What more do you want to learn or do based on reading this chapter of the book?

 

For more on this, please support the author and buy his book at Amazon or Fortress Press. I do not receive any compensation for this summary.

Future Faith: Challenge One: Revitalizing Withering Congregations

Read the introduction to this series here.

Scott Thumma (Director of the Hartford Institute of Religion Research, affiliated with Hartford Seminary in Connecticut) believes that 30-40 percent of congregations in the United States will close in the next thirty years.

David Roozen, Scott Thumma’s colleague at the Hartford Institute, has coordinated a comprehensive study of US congregations, with reports issued every five years. This Faith Communities Today study for 2015 discovered that for the first time in recent history, over half of US congregations -57.9 percent had under one hundred members.

Roozen’s survey shows that congregations with more than one hundred members show a greater likelihood of reporting “high spiritual vitality.” Congregations with 350 members or more have better chances to survive and thrive.

Furthermore, Roozen’s study points out, that “In a rapidly changing world, thriving congregations are nearly ten times more likely to have changed themselves as are struggling congregations.”

So, the first challenge facing the future of Christianity, at least in the United States (read Western World), is this: Most congregations must change or face a slow but certain demographic death.

In the more than 1600 megachurches of the United States, 80 percent have a food pantry or soup kitchen, 59 percent are involved in job training, and more than half have programs for literacy and tutoring. Most megachurches are laboratories of change; innovation is in their DNA. This shows that if a congregation wants do adapt to a changing demographic it would be to provide more than just the Bible. The Church needs to be a place of safety where food can be enjoyed in order to learn, to create a better future for all.

In the last century, Christianity’s growth was twice the rate of Asia’s population growth. In contrast to American (read Western) Christianity, many younger people in China are moving away from being “Nones” -those without any religious affiliation, reflecting the nation’s Communist legacy- to becoming those who embrace religion. Today, one out of four Christians in the world is an African.

About two-thirds of immigrants coming to the United States are Christians, bringing with them the vitality, texture, and expressions of faith formed in non-Western cultures. While often unrecognized and unappreciated, these Christian pilgrims are beginning to alter America’s religious landscape in fresh and unexpected ways.

The world is interconnected as never before. The irony is that the global narrative tells of a world becoming more religious, with Christianity experiencing dynamic growth and change that is bringing fresh spiritual vitality and relevant social impact. The question is whether US churches will be locked into a parochial story of their gradual demise or liberated by a global story that is bringing new life into its midst from unexpected places.

discussion guide

  • What one word or phrase would you use to describe your faith community or congregation? Do you see the description as positive or negative (or neither)? Why?
  • The author cites statistics that point to a decline in people attending both mainline and some evangelical church denominations? Has your faith community experienced such decline? If so, why? If not, why not?
  • In contrast, many faith communities across the world are growing. What does the author suggest the North American church can learn from these vibrant and growing communities of faith?
  • What example of the growing global church provided in the chapter was particularly striking to you? Why?
  • What more do you want to learn or do based on reading this chapter of the book?

 

For more on this, please support the author and buy his book at Amazon or Fortress Press. I do not receive any compensation for this summary.